AI Score

AIRRNK's 0–100 grade for how likely a site is to be cited by a language model, calculated from 47 weighted checks across four pillars.

The AI Score compresses a site's AI readiness into a single number. It's computed from 47 individual checks across four pillars — technical readiness, content extractability, schema coverage, and authority & freshness — each weighted by empirical regression against real citation-rate data.

Weights are re-fit quarterly against a cohort of roughly 3,000 tracked sites. The score is calibrated such that 85+ represents the top decile of sites in our dataset; 70–84 is solid; 50–69 is average; below 50 indicates significant gaps.

The score is a proxy, not a rank. There is no public ranking against which to measure AI visibility, because LLM retrieval is probabilistic and platform-specific. The score captures 'readiness to be cited' in a way that correlates with 30-day forward citation rate at roughly 0.72 in our data.

In AIRRNK

The AI Score is the single headline metric in every AIRRNK report, dashboard, and email. It's also the target that our copilot optimizes for — every suggested fix is ranked by its expected AI Score delta, so you always know which lever moves the number most.

Signals · sourced
72.4%of cited pages include ≥2 question-based H2sCited-page pattern audit, 2026
+30–40%citation lift when GEO schema is correctly appliedAggarwal et al. · Princeton
42%of B2B buyer research now starts inside an LLMForrester Research, 2026

Written by

The AIRank Editorial Team

Research & editorial, AIRank

The AIRank editorial team runs the 47-point scanner, the Observer pings, and the GEO research programme every week. Writing is reviewed by the core engineers who build the Injector, Blaster, and Surgeon agents.

About the team →